Part 2 of a 2 Part Series Spotlight. Image includes a briefcase and healthcare symbol with prescription drug bottle and 2 red and yellow capsules against a blue background.

3 Questions to Ask When Evaluating a Bundled Medical and Prescription Benefit

When evaluating the alleged advantages of a bundled medical and pharmacy approach, employers and consultants should ask their medical carrier a few critical questions:

  1. Does the carrier outsource its prescription drug program to a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM)?
  2. Is there documented cost savings from bundling medical and prescription benefits—and where is the reporting that validates those savings?
  3. Will the carrier share medical claims data with a carved‑out PBM to support clinical programs and cost‑containment efforts?

Most medical carriers already use external PBMs to administer their bundled prescription drug programs—evidence that specialized expertise is crucial in this field. For example, Horizon partners with Prime Therapeutics, Cigna with Express Scripts, UnitedHealth Group with OptumRx, and Aetna with CVS Caremark to manage prescription drug benefits for their employer-sponsored plans.

These relationships clearly demonstrate that medical carriers and PBMs do not operate on fully integrated adjudication or reporting systems. Yet they successfully and routinely exchange detailed medical and pharmacy claims and payment files. This proves that medical carriers can—and already do—work effectively with external PBM partners.

Importantly, medical carriers are not limited to sharing data with their affiliated PBMs. Most will also share medical data files with an employer’s selected carve‑out PBM, allowing care coordination, clinical programs, and cost‑management strategies to be implemented effectively.

These factors prompt additional important questions that remain unanswered:

  • If a carve‑out PBM can receive the same comprehensive data as an affiliated PBM, why wouldn’t the medical carrier still be able to deliver the same—or better—cost savings?
  • If coordination and data sharing can exist outside of a bundled arrangement, why do some medical carriers impose monetary penalties when an employer chooses to unbundle the prescription drug benefit?

Bring these questions to the table at your next meeting with your bundled medical carrier.

If you would like to discuss more about how Benecard can help assist in validating savings to your medical program through our Pharmacogenetics program and working with your medical carrier to cross share data files, please reach out to us at talktous@benecard.com.

If you missed part 1 of this spotlight, click here to read.

Sources:

  1. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/pharmacy-benefit-managers-staff-report.pdf#page=16

Image of Briefcase and health plan symbol with a prescription drug bottle and pills. Part 1 of a 2 part series spotlight

Bundled Medical and Rx Benefits: Smart Strategy or Costly Trade-Off?

It is still commonplace for employers to have their medical and prescription drug benefits bundled together (carved-in).  However, new federal Prescription Benefit Manager (PBM) reforms such as the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) 20261 focus on transparency and fiduciary responsibilities, highlighting the importance of understanding where and how your money is being spent.  

Do Bundled Benefits Actually Deliver Savings?

Some medical carriers, under a fully insured funding arrangement, impose monetary penalties on employer-sponsored plans who choose to unbundle (carve-out) their prescription drug benefits.  These carriers often claim that bundling medical and pharmacy services generates cost savings by enabling integrated data analysis, but where is the proof? In many cases, employers are not provided with clear or verifiable reports that validate such savings. 

Consider this… most medical carriers rely on external PBMs to administer their bundled prescription drug benefits—an acknowledgment that specialized expertise is essential in this area.  This clearly supports the idea that medical carriers and PBMs do not operate on fully integrated adjudication or reporting systems, weakening the argument for bundled benefits. Additionally, most PBMs are fully capable of sharing detailed, timely claims data with medical carriers, which does achieve the same level of coordination as a bundled model. This raises a fundamental question: if comparable outcomes are achievable without bundling, why are monetary penalties necessary? A valid question to bring to your bundled medical carrier to answer.

What Happens to Benefit Integrity?

Bundling often creates commingled data that lacks accuracy and transparency. For example, medical devices such as insulin pump supplies are intentionally adjudicated or paid under an employer’s prescription benefit rather than the medical benefit. Such inconsistencies can create challenges for the employers, especially during request for proposal (RFP) evaluations, budget forecasting, and the transition process during a carrier change.

What if Medical Cost Savings Could Be Validated Through the Prescription Benefit?

Medication failure is the largest avoidable cost in any health plan—yet it’s often overlooked. Overall, it’s costing $3.5 billion in emergency room visits due to wrongly prescribed medications.2 Compounded by the fact that 50% of medications prescribed are either ineffective or minimally effective.3

The biggest opportunity to reduce spend isn’t where most plans are looking and it doesn’t require collective bargaining or benefit changes.  Medication failure often leads to unnecessary emergency room (ER) visits and inpatient stays. Integrating medical and prescription data with a pharmacogenetics program can result in savings to the employer’s medical plan and better member adherence to their prescription drug regimen.

Benecard addresses medication failure head on through personalized medication therapy for members in an employer’s group. This is achieved with the help of clinical pharmacists, PGx testing (type of DNA testing), and data science. The savings are often seen on the medical side through lower emergency room visits and inpatient stays. 

Next time you look at a bundled medical and prescription drug quote, consider these factors before deciding to bundle or unbundle your benefit.

To read part 2 of this spotlight, click here. If you have questions you would like to discuss with us, please contact us at talktous@benecard.com.

Sources:

1. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7148

2. Watanambe, McInnis. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2018, Vol. 52(9) 829-837

3. FDA. Paving the Way for Personalized Medicine. 10/2013

NJ State Flag with US Flag behind it flowing in the wind. NJ Flag is yellow, blue and red.

NJ SHBP-LG Mid-Year Report Confirms Continued Financial Plights

On March 30th, the New Jersey Department of Treasury released Aon’s Midyear Experience Analysis Report for the State Health Benefit Program Local Government (SHBP-LG).  The report reveals that the SHBP-LG continues its troubling financial position despite significant rate increases implemented on January 1, 2026. It also indicates that, following those increases, the claim stabilization reserve (CSR) was expected to improve to $340 million. However, the updated analysis suggests the SHBP-LG CSR is expecting a deficit of more than $200 million by the end of this year.

The report documents various factors for the SHBP-LG’s continued financial deterioration including but not limited to:

  1. Trends continue to run high with the most recent 12-month period reflecting 10.7% and 21.7% increases in medical and prescription, respectively for the Actives population.
  2. Enrollment decline in the SHBP, as groups continue to leave the state and enter into direct contracts with private carriers in favor of more affordable coverage.

The main cost drivers for the SHBP-LG Actives prescription plan comes from GLP-1 and anti-inflammatory drugs. GLP-1 drugs account for four of the top five drugs in terms of drug spend, while anti-inflammatory drugs make up three of the top 11 drugs based on drug spend.

Although the report does not implicitly forecast exact rate actions for January 1, 2027, it does imply by the negative CSR forecast, continued double digits of trends, and loss of membership a possible need for another significant high increase and/or major changes to existing plan designs.

Benecard remains actively engaged in monitoring this situation and will continue to keep you informed of any updates related to the NJ SHBP-LG. If you have questions or would like to discuss, please reach out to us at talktous@benecard.com.

Sources:

https://www.nj.gov/treasury/pensions/documents/hb/rate-renewal/mid-year-analysis-local-gov-PY2025.pdf/mid-year-analysis-local-gov-PY2025.pdf

https://www.nj.gov/treasury/pensions/documents/hb/rate-renewal/SHBC-mid-year-analysis-presentation-PY2025.pdf

    Teacher in classroom with student raising hand.

    NJ SEHBP Mid-Year Report Confirms Continued Financial Troubles

    This past week, the New Jersey Department of Treasury released Aon’s mid-year financial report for the School Employees Health Benefit Program (SEHBP).  The report shows the SEHBP continues its troubling financial situation despite implementing large rate increases which took place January 1, 2026. It also suggests that after the large increase for 2026, the claim stabilization reserve (CSR) funding was expected to have improved to $121 million. However, the updated analysis suggests the SEHBP will now be at a $30 million negative CSR by the end of this year.

    The report documents three significant factors for the SEHBP’s continued financial deterioration:

    1. Trends continue to run higher than expected with the most recent 12-month period reflecting 12% and 24% increases in medical and prescription, respectively.
    2. Enrollment decline in the SEHBP, as groups continue to leave the state and enter into direct contracts with private carriers in favor of more affordable coverage.
    3. Continued mandated migration of new members into the Educator’s Health Plan (Chapter 44) at undervalued rates that don’t support the plan benefits or claim experience.

    The main drivers of cost for the SEHBP prescription plan comes from GLP-1 and anti-inflammatory drugs.  GLP-1 drugs account for four of the top five drugs in terms of drug spend, while anti-inflammatory drugs make up four of the top 10 drugs based on drug spend.

    Although the report does not implicitly forecast exact rate actions for January 1, 2027, it does imply by the negative CSR forecast, continued double-digit trends and loss of membership that could signal a need for another significant high increase and/or major changes to existing plan designs.

    Benecard remains actively engaged in monitoring this situation and will continue to keep you informed of any updates related to the NJ SEHBP. If you have questions or would like to discuss, please reach out to us at talktous@benecard.com.

    Sources:

    1. https://www.nj.gov/treasury/pensions/documents/hb/rate-renewal/SEHBC-mid-year-analysis-presentation-PY2025.pdf
    2. https://www.nj.gov/treasury/pensions/documents/hb/rate-renewal/mid-year-analysis-local-edu-PY2025.pd
    NJ State Flag with US Flag behind it flowing in the wind. NJ Flag is yellow, blue and red.

    Update: Prescription Drug Plan Changes Approved for NJ SHBP-LG

    (Effective July 1, 2026)

    On September 24, 2025, the NJ SHBP Plan Design Committee (PDC) met and approved several changes to the prescription drug plans for the State Health Benefits Program – Local Government (SHBP-LG).  The changes were initially planned for January 1, 2026, but were delayed. 

    On February 11, 2026, the PDC announced key updates to the previously approved SHBP-LG plan options, leading with the effective date which is now slated to be July 1, 2026.

    Key Updates

    For SHBP-LG Actives and Early Retirees, the plan design changes do not apply to the current plan options.  Instead, a new plan option was created that will be offered alongside the other available plans.  There were no changes to Medicare-eligible retirees.

    Effective July 1, 2026 the new plan offering will have the following plan design:

    • ● Non-diabetic GLP-1 drugs prescribed for weight loss will have a $45 copay per 30-day supply until the State implements a lifestyle management program. Once the program is active, members who participate will continue paying the $45 copay, while those who do not participate in a lifestyle management program will see their copay rise to $125 per 30-day supply. The implementation of this program is still uncertain at this time but intended to be available for July 1, 2026.
    • ● Generic drugs: $10 retail (per 30-day supply) / $10 mail order (90-day supply)
    • ● Preferred brand drugs: $20 retail (per 30-day supply) / $50 mail order (90-day supply)
    • ● Non-preferred brand drugs: $75 retail (per 30-day supply) / $150 mail order (90-day supply)
    • ● Specialty drugs: $75 (available through mail order only, up to a 30-day supply)

    In addition, mail order will become mandatory for all maintenance drugs. The resolution also sets new out-of-pocket maximums for prescription drug benefits: $2,120 for individuals and $4,240 for families. All other prescription benefits remain unchanged—such as mandatory generic, mandatory mail order for specialty drugs, step therapy, and an exclusionary formulary. 

    The new plan option provides for a 4.7% rate reduction off of the January 2026 renewal increase for the Rx for local government actives that enroll in the plan.  For the early retirees who enroll in this plan, the rate reduction is 2.9% off the January 2026 renewal increase.  These rates do include a 6% margin to help build the CSR balance plus an additional load to collect amounts owed under Chapter 86.

    Benecard will continue to closely monitor this ongoing situation and keep you updated on any further developments or communications related to the NJ SHBP-LG. In the meantime, if you have any questions on this topic, please email us at talktous@benecard.com.

    Sources:

    1 “SHBP PDC Resolution #2025-11”, NJ Treasury
    2 “State Health Benefits Program – July 2026 Premium Rate Update”, AON

    Medical Science Laboratory: Portrait of Beautiful Black Scientist Looking Under Microscope Does Analysis of Test Sample. Ambitious Young Biotechnology Specialist, working with Advanced Equipment

    Managing the Next Wave of GLP-1 Weight Loss Breakthroughs

    The GLP-1 landscape continues to evolve rapidly. Along with the recent FDA approval of Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy® oral pill—which we addressed in a separate update last week—additional GLP-1 therapy breakthroughs are delivering promising weight loss results, expanding long-term maintenance use, and broadening the population eligible for treatment. While the clinical potential is compelling, the financial implications for plan sponsors are significant, and underscore why proactive benefit strategy remains critical for employers and health plans.

    Next-Generation Weight Loss Drug Developments

    Eli Lilly’s latest results for retatrutide illustrate the rapid evolution of weight loss drugs. The triple-agonist therapy, which activates 3 receptors in the body (GLP-1, GIP, and Glucagon) to more effectively manage blood sugar and weight, delivered nearly 29% average weight loss after 68 weeks in patients with obesity and knee osteoarthritis, along with meaningful pain reduction.1 In contrast, existing weight loss injection therapies—including Saxenda®, Wegovy®, and Zepbound®—have demonstrated approximately 10% to 21% total weight loss over a similar timeframe (roughly 54 to 72 weeks).

    Concurrently, recent trials have indicated that Eli Lilly is positioning its oral GLP-1 candidate, orforglipron, as a maintenance therapy following initial weight loss. While Novo Nordisk has taken an early lead with FDA approval of the Wegovy® oral pill, Lilly’s oral GLP-1 has also been awarded a national priority review voucher by the FDA2, which could accelerate regulatory timelines. Together, these developments highlight how next-generation GLP-1 drugs may impact both utilization patterns and pharmacy spend, particularly for long-term maintenance treatment.

    Looking further ahead, investments in companies like Prolynx points to a new wave of long-acting obesity treatments designed for monthly or quarterly dosing. These innovations would aim to improve adherence and persistence by addressing real-world limitations of today’s weekly GLP-1 regimens, further expanding utilization.3

    Benecard’s Perspective

    At Benecard Services, we see this moment as an opportunity for smarter benefit design.  Rather than blanket exclusions, we help clients implement clinically informed strategies that balance patient access with long-term cost sustainability. This includes defined treatment parameters, centralized management to enhance oversight, proactive planning for emerging therapies, and alignment with manufacturer programs where appropriate.

    For more details regarding Benecard’s comprehensive GLP-1 strategy, please contact your Benecard Client Relations Manager, Sales representative, or visit our Rx Insights blog to view our article on strategic GLP-1 drug management.

    Sources:

    1. Lilly’s three-pronged drug puts obesity field ‘on notice’ | BioPharma Dive
    2. Lilly obesity pill, headed for quick FDA review, hits mark in ‘maintenance’ trial | BioPharma Dive
    3. Prolynx banks $70M for longer-lasting obesity drugs | BioPharma Dive

    Untitled design (38)

    FDA Approval of Novo Nordisk’s Oral GLP-1 Marks a New Phase in Obesity Treatment

    The GLP-1 landscape continues to move quickly. On December 22nd, Novo Nordisk announced FDA approval of the Wegovy® pill which will be commercialized in the U.S. as of early January 20261. While additional details are still emerging, this approval itself represents a meaningful shift in how weight loss therapies may be accessed and utilized moving forward.

    What’s Different About an Oral GLP-1 Therapy

    Unlike injectable GLP-1 therapies, the Wegovy® pill is taken once daily. In clinical trials, the oral formulation demonstrated meaningful and comparable weight loss to the Wegovy shot, though outcomes were generally slightly lower than injectable GLP-1s2. This difference is expected, as oral medications are partially broken down during digestion, requiring higher daily doses compared to weekly injections.

    Importantly, Novo Nordisk is positioning the Wegovy® pill not just for initial weight reduction, but as a long-term maintenance therapy. This emphasis on maintenance may influence prescribing patterns, adherence expectations, and duration of therapy—all key considerations for plan sponsors.

    Why This Matters for Plan Sponsors

    While pricing details are still emerging, this approval validates that GLP-1 innovation is shifting from injectables to more versatile, patient-centric formats. The upcoming Wegovy® pill’s commercial launch reinforces the potential for broader utilization, longer treatment durations tied to maintenance therapy, and ongoing needs for clinical oversight and formulary alignment.

    At Benecard Services, we view this approval as further confirmation that benefit strategies must evolve alongside rapid GLP-1 breakthroughs. As therapies expand in form and function—from triple-agonists to long-acting formulations and now oral agents—thoughtful benefit design and proactive planning are critical.

    We are actively monitoring ongoing developments and will share deeper analysis and strategic guidance in the weeks ahead. For now, this approval serves as a timely reminder: the next phase of GLP-1 therapy is here, and preparation matters.

    Sources:

    1. Press Release: Novo Nordisk A/S: Wegovy® pill approved in the US as first oral GLP-1 for weight management
    2. With FDA approval of Wegovy pill, new era of oral GLP-1 weight loss drugs begins.

    GENERIC DRUG APPROVALS

    July 2024

    • Indium In-111 Pentetreotide Injection Kit 3 mCi/mL
      Approved: July 1, 2024 – Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
      Used for: Diagnosis and Investigation
      Generic for: Octreoscan
    • Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension 133mg/10mL (13.3mg/mL) and 266mg/20mL
      (13.3mg/mL)
      Approved: July 1, 2024 – Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
      Used for: Analgesia
      Generic for: Exparel

    June 2024

    • Palbociclib Tablets 75mg, 100mg and 125mg
      Approved: June 5, 2024 – Synthon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      Treatment for: Breast Cancer
      Generic for: Ibrance Tablets
    • Avanafil Tablets 50mg, 100mg and 200mg
      Approved: June 14, 2024 – Hetero Labs Limited
      Treatment for: Erectile Dysfunction
      Generic for: Stendra
    • Phentermine Hydrochloride and Topiramate Extended-Release Capsules 3.75mg (base)/23mg,
      7.5mg (base)/46mg, 11.25mg (base)/69mg and 15mg (base)/92mg
      Approved: June 25, 2024 – Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.
      Treatment for: Obesity
      Generic for: Qsymia

    KISUNLA™

    FDA Approves Kisunla for the Treatment of Early Symptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Kisunla™ (donanemab-azbt, 350mg/20mL injection for IV infusion) as treatment of early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) which includes people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as well as people with the mild dementia stage of AD, with confirmed amyloid pathology.

    • Once-monthly Kisunla IV infusion is the first and only amyloid plaque-targeting therapy with evidence to support stopping therapy when amyloid plaques are removed, which can result in lower treatment costs and fewer infusions.
    • Among the overall population of Phase 3 study participants, Kisunla reduced amyloid plaques on average by 61% at 6 months, 80% at 12 months, and 84% at 18 months compared to the start of the study.
    • The FDA’s dosing instructions state that prescribers can consider stopping the dosing of Kisunla based on removal of amyloid plaques to minimal levels as observed on amyloid PET imaging.

    Read more…